

Early today we linked to a piece asking “when, if ever, can a democracy exclude anti-democratic politicians and parties from democratic elections?” Read it here.
Well, it appears that the Colorado Supreme Court has its own ideas on the matter. Here is CNN:
The Colorado Supreme Court decision disqualifying Donald Trump from the 2024 primary ballot reversed the trial judgeâs conclusion that the 14th Amendmentâs âinsurrectionist banâ doesnât apply to the presidency.Â
Section 3 of the 14th Amendment says:
âNo person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State,â if they took an oath to âsupportâ the Constitution and then engaged in insurrection.
But it doesnât say anything about the presidency.
The trial judge concluded that because of the vagueness and omissions in the constitutional amendment, the ban doesnât apply to the presidency.Â
But the Colorado Supreme Court disagreed. The court said there was enough evidence to conclude that âthe drafters of this Amendment intended the phrase âany officeâ to be broadly inclusive, and certainly to include the Presidency.âÂ
âWe do not place the same weight the district court did on the fact that the Presidency is not specifically mentioned in Section Three. It seems most likely that the Presidency is not specifically included because it is so evidently an âoffice,ââ the court said in its decision.Â
The justices continued: âA conclusion that the Presidency is something other than an office âunderâ the United States is fundamentally at odds with the idea that all government officials, including the President, serve âwe the people.ââ
Read more here.
The court even quotes Gorsuch in their decision.
The court cites former Supreme Court Judge Neil Gorsuch in Hassan v. Colorado, saying, “it is ‘a stateâs legitimate interest in protecting the integrity and practical functioning of the political process’ that ‘permits it to exclude from the ballot candidates who are constitutionally prohibited from assuming office.'”
Yes–I saw that. It will be interesting to see how this plays out.