• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Current
  • Home
  • About
    • About Current
    • Masthead
  • Podcasts
  • Blogs
    • The Way of Improvement Leads Home
    • The Arena
  • Reviews
  • 🔎
  • Way of Improvement

Dr. Oz is running for a U.S. Senate seat. He’s been there before.

John Fea   |  December 3, 2021

Oz is running for Pat Toomey’s Pennsylvania Senate seat. Get up to speed here.

But as Ian Ward reminds us at Politico, he has been there before. Here’s a taste:

On a hot summer morning in June of 2014, Mehmet Oz, M.D. — or, as he is known to millions of adoring fans around the country, Dr. Oz — arrived on Capitol Hill ready to play the victim. Oz had been invited to Washington to testify before the Senate Subcommittee on Consumer Protection, Product Safety and Insurance during a hearing on false advertising in the diet and weight-loss industry. He presented his role clearly: As the victim of unscrupulous advertisers’ vicious attempts to twist his words to sell diet pills, he was perfectly positioned to help Congress curb the tide of deceptive advertising.

There was only one problem with the doctor’s plan. Inside the hearing room, the members of the subcommittee had cast him in a different role: not as the victim of scheming fraudsters but as the fraudster himself.

For the duration of the hour-long hearing, members of the subcommittee lined up one after the next to grill “America’s Doctor” for statements he made on “The Dr. Oz Show,” his daytime cable program on health and wellness, laying into him for his endorsements of the miraculous powers of green coffee extract and the fat-burning magic of raspberry ketone. From his spot behind the witness table, Oz refused to back down. He brandished print-outs of scientific studies to defend his statements about various weight-loss supplements and cited transcripts of his TV appearances to show how advertisers had taken his words out of context. At one point during the question-and-answer portion of the testimony, Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), the subcommittee’s chair, grew visibly agitated at Oz’s evasiveness, blurting out, “I’ve tried to do a lot of research in preparation for this trial and the scientific community is almost monolithic against you.” It was a hearing, not a trial, but McCaskill’s slip was telling: The committee was trying to put pseudoscience on trial, and Oz was the star witness.

Read the entire piece here.

John Fea
+ postsBio
  • John Fea
    That’s a wrap!
  • John Fea
    The Way of Improvement Leads Home blog has moved
  • John Fea
    Pamela Paul’s last New York Times column
  • John Fea
    Evangelicals and politics roundup: Wisconsin, Cory Booker, spiritual warfare, refugees, and more.
  • John Fea
    Goodbye to a Four-Year Labor of Love
  • John Fea
    Wisconsin sends Trump-Musk a message
  • John Fea
    “Would you want your doctors not to be revisionists?”
  • John Fea
    All four #1 seeds made the Final Four this year. What happened to Cinderella?
  • John Fea
    It’s the last week of CURRENT
  • John Fea
    Sunday night odds and ends
  • John Fea
    Trump’s executive order on American history has little to do with history
  • John Fea
    Should Jeffrey Goldberg have “left the room?”
  • John Fea
    What an ending!
  • John Fea
    “You can’t hold onto anything in this world. That doesn’t mean you can’t squeeze it all so tightly to your heart that it hurts.”
  • John Fea
    Is Trump capitulation “on the way out?”
  • John Fea
    Did Patrick Henry really say “Give me liberty or give me death?”
  • John Fea
    Hey Silicon Valley, “Christianity…is not a religion that can reliably deliver socially desirable outcomes, nor is it intended to be.”
  • John Fea
    The second Trump presidency is two months old. What are evangelical saying?
  • John Fea
    We need more democrats
  • John Fea
    “What if the Mets are actually good now?”

Filed Under: Way of Improvement Tagged With: junk science, Mehmet Oz, Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania politics, Senate