

MAGA activist Steve Bannon went to prison yesterday. The New York Times columnist David Brooks interviewed Bannon a few days before he reported for his sentence. Here are a few snippets of their conversation:
You said something Iâve got to ask you about, that Trumpâs a moderate. In what areas is the MAGA movement farther right than Trump?
I think farther right on radical cuts of spending, No. 1. I think weâre much more hard-core on things like Ukraine. President Trump is a peacemaker. He wants to go in and negotiate and figure something out as a deal maker. I think 75 percent of our movement would want an immediate, total shutdown â not one more penny in Ukraine, and massive investigations about where the money went. On the southern border and mass deportations, I donât think President Trumpâs close to where we are. They all got to go home.
Also, on artificial intelligence, weâre virulently anti-A.I. I think big regulations have to come.
President Trump is a kindhearted person. Heâs a people person, right? On China, I think he admires Xi Jinping. But weâre super-hawks. We want to see an elimination of the Chinese Communist Party.
Do you worry that your broader movement will be fatally poisoned by antisemitic elements, the conspiracy crazies?
Weâre the most pro-Israel and pro-Jewish group out there. What I say is that not just the future of Israel but the future of American Jews, not just safety but their ability to thrive and prosper as they have in this country, is conditional upon one thing, and thatâs a hard weld with Christian nationalism.
If I can make one comparison: Early in my career, I worked for Bill Buckley. His manner at National Review reminds me a little of some of the things you do. He created an intense sense of belonging: Weâre the conservative movement. Weâre all in this together. Every day weâre marching forward. But he also had a strong sense of who was a wack job, a conspiracist. And he was going to draw a line. Pat Buchanan was on the other side of the line.
So what I admire about Buckley is obviously the intense thing of belonging. What I donât admire is the no fight. Itâs very much an intellectual debating society, right?
I use you and George Will as examples of this all the time. Brilliant guys, but this is a street fight. We need to be street fighters. This is going to be determined on social media and getting people out to vote. Itâs not going to be debated on the Upper East Side or Upper West Side.
Iâve found that most people are pretty reasonable. You can have a conversation, and youâll at least see where theyâre coming from.
I think youâre dead [expletive] wrong.
Thatâs where we disagree.
No, itâs 100 percent disagree. What are you talking about? They think youâre an exotic animal. Youâre a conservative, but youâre not dangerous. Youâre reasonable. Weâre not reasonable. Weâre unreasonable because weâre fighting for a republic. And weâre never going to be reasonable until we get what we achieve. Weâre not looking to compromise. Weâre looking to win.
Now, the biggest element that Buckley had that the book âBowling Aloneâ had, and you talk about, is the atomization of our society. Thereâs no civic bonding. Thereâs no national cohesion. Thereâs not even the Lions Club things that you used to have before. People tell me all the time: âYou changed my life. I ran for the board of supervisors, and now Iâm on the board of supervisors.â They have friends that they never had met before, and theyâre in a common cause, and itâs changed their life. Theyâre on social media. Every day, they have action they have to do.
This was Hannah Arendtâs point that loneliness is a seedbed for authoritarianism. But youâre not about conversing with the other side, youâre just fighting with the other side.
What do you mean, not conversing with? Thereâs nothing to talk about.
Well, how about you have a conversation with the Biden administration. The Biden administration has spent a lot of money. And now, when I go to Central Ohio, theyâve got an Intel plant coming in. You go to Upstate New York, theyâve got a Micron plant. These are benefits for the working class.
Some of that stuffâs OK. But on the fundamental direction of the country, we are separate. We are two different worldviews. And those worldviews canât be bridged.
When did you come to see the world this way? I mean, obviously, you were at Harvard Business School and Goldman Sachs. Did you have a front-row seat and think, âOh, this sucksâ?
I took Michael Porterâs classes at Harvard back in the â80s, and globalization was â Harvard, at that time, treated this as the second law of thermodynamics. It was a natural property that could not be questioned. And then I went to the M. & A. department at Goldman Sachs and I worked with Hank Paulson. I was put on a lot of things to sell companies. You could just see America was being gutted. You had Mike Milken and the junk bond guys, and they were after these companies. And you go out there, and the companies were not particularly well run.
The guys were always going to the country club, and the management was very detached from labor â you see this evisceration, you saw these jobs going, and they were never coming back.
And then I read Christopher Lasch. I was just doing my thing, had my own finance firm. And then 9/11 happens. And everybodyâs down singing âGod Bless America.â And I said, âI wonder how long this âGod Bless Americaâ phase is going to go.â I was adamantly opposed to Iraq and Afghanistan. And one of the things that got me the most was I couldnât believe that George W. Bush didnât have his daughters go into the military. How do you do this? I remember reading guys saying we could have much better recruiting if we had those two as symbols.…
Finally, Iâve got to ask you about whatâs about to happen to you â going to prison.
I spent my 20s on a Navy ship. If I have to spend my 70s in a prison, Iâm still fighting. This show will be bigger. My message will be stronger.
Youâre not concerned?
No. Iâll get the message out and fight for this. History is a process. Iâm kind of honored, in one way, that they hate me so much they feel they have to put Bannon away. Their thing is that, if we put Bannon in prison or get him away from his microphone, thatâll help us win. It will be the exact opposite.
Every day is a fight. People in this movement, when they talk to me, they say they have a purpose. Once they have a purpose, you canât stop this movement. Weâre not going to win everything. Just like in Europe, youâre going to have defeats. Some days are going to be cloudy. But the sunlit uplands are in front of you. Just keep your head down and keep grinding.
Read the entire interview here.