These objections are standard fare, and easily answered (by those who understand scripture (which alas seems to include neither today’s Christian nationalists nor W Wing’s brash secularists). Just my opinion.
I think that David French nailed it in today’s NYT editorial when he said that evangelical Republicans are now “inflexible about policy positions even when the Bible is silent or vague,” and “flexible about morality even when the Bible is clear.”
These objections are standard fare, and easily answered (by those who understand scripture (which alas seems to include neither today’s Christian nationalists nor W Wing’s brash secularists). Just my opinion.
I think that David French nailed it in today’s NYT editorial when he said that evangelical Republicans are now “inflexible about policy positions even when the Bible is silent or vague,” and “flexible about morality even when the Bible is clear.”