• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Current
  • Home
  • About
    • About Current
    • Masthead
  • Podcasts
  • Blogs
    • The Way of Improvement Leads Home
    • The Arena
  • Reviews
  • 🔎
  • Way of Improvement

Manhattan jury: Donald Trump sexually abused E. Jean Carroll

John Fea   |  May 10, 2023

Here is David French:

It’s important to note that this was a civil case, not a criminal trial. The burden of proof in civil cases is lower. The jury was charged with determining whether Carroll proved her claims with a preponderance of the evidence, not beyond a reasonable doubt. In other words, it had to decide whether Carroll’s claims were more likely true than false.

But the case was not a simple matter of “he said, she said.” Carroll provided her own testimony, of course. But she also presented evidence that she had told others about the assault at the time, as well as evidence from other women that Trump had assaulted them and touched them without their consent.

Trump declined to testify at the trial, but the jury did see his videotaped deposition, during which he denied Carroll’s claims but also doubled down on his assertions in the infamous “Access Hollywood” video. “I just start kissing them,” he said on the tape, “It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.” He added: “Grab ‘em by the [genitals]. You can do anything.”

In the deposition, Carroll’s lawyer, Roberta A. Kaplan, asked Trump specifically about that quote. “Well, historically, that’s true with stars,” he responded. When she pressed him, he doubled down: “Well, that’s what — if you look over the last million years, I guess that’s been largely true,” Mr. Trump said. “Not always, but largely true. Unfortunately or fortunately.”

I spent decades litigating cases, including a number of sexual harassment cases, and as I watched the evidence accumulate, I reached a tipping point — I would have been surprised by any verdict other than the one we received Tuesday. Juries can always surprise you, of course, but what made the verdict truly notable wasn’t the outcome. It was the identity of the defendant. In an important moment for the rule of law, a jury heard evidence against a former president and reached exactly the conclusion that it likely would have reached for anyone else.

Now America faces an all-too-familiar challenge. The court system has once again delivered an outcome supported by the law and by substantial evidence. But will that change Republican hearts and minds?

Read the rest here.

Of course when you are God’s anointed one you can do whatever you want:

Corrupt NY Court Makes Trump Pay 5 Million for a crime against a women he never met! Trump asked if the lady ever sought surveillance evidence of him even being at location! None provided. His lawyer were denied ability to cross examine. Trump Responds https://t.co/dEv8TDdTfD

— Lance Wallnau (@lancewallnau) May 9, 2023

I’m guessing Bob Jeffress will be silent about these charges against Trump:

🤔"Evangelicals know they are not compromising their beliefs in order to support this great president,…evangelicals “knew they weren’t voting for an altar boy” when they cast their ballots."- Robert Jeffress, Pastor of First Baptist Church in Dallas https://t.co/ZK2wkUNAp8

— Baptizing Feminism: a film & awareness project (@BaptizeFeminism) May 9, 2023

Filed Under: Way of Improvement Tagged With: David French, Donald Trump, E. Jean Carroll, Lance Wallnau, Robert Jeffress, sexual assault