• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
    • About Current
    • Masthead
  • Podcasts
  • Blogs
    • The Way of Improvement Leads Home
    • The Arena
  • Support
  • Way of Improvement
  • About John
  • Vita
  • Books
  • Speaking
  • Media Requests

The Supreme Court has always been political

John Fea   |  April 4, 2022 Leave a Comment

Here is Joshua Zeitz at Politico:

It’s not every day that the wife of a sitting Supreme Court justice conspires to overturn the results of a free and fair election. Yet that’s where we are. The stunning revelation of text messages between Virginia Thomas, known as Ginni, and then-Chief of Staff Mark Meadows in January 2021 threatens to knock the last leg out from under an institution that many Americans have already lost faith in.

According to Gallup, the percentage of respondents who approve of the way the Supreme Court conducts its job has declined over the past two decades from 60 percent to just 40 percent; in the same period, the percentage who disapprove climbed from just 29 percent to 53 percent. In a separate poll, Quinnipiac found that 61 percent of respondents — including a majority of Republicans — believe that the justices are motivated principally by politics. Only 32 percent believe that the justices lead with the law.

Popular dissatisfaction with the Supreme Court today is rooted in a fundamental belief that justices should be apolitical actors — neutral umpires who just call “balls and strikes.” If the Supreme Court were to devolve into just one more political institution, in an age of extreme partisanship and polarization, the fear goes, the guardrails supporting our Constitutional system would fall away.

It’s not an unreasonable concern. But the idea of an apolitical court is a fairly recent development.For the better part of American history, the U.S. Supreme Court was a much more partisan and political institution than we remember. The justices who sat on its bench were once and future elected officials, advisers to presidents and even presidential aspirants themselves. From John McLean and Salmon P. Chase in the 19th century to William O. Douglas in the 20th, justices often kept a wandering eye on the White House.Abe Fortas had a direct phone line to the president of the United States and even wrote some of his speeches. Justices also accepted outside income and affiliated with third-party interest groups.

Whether the U.S. Supreme Court should keep politics at a far distance is one question. Whether it historically did is another.

Read the rest here.

Filed Under: Way of Improvement Tagged With: legal history, Supreme Court

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Patron Access

The Way of Improvement Leads Home

Commonplace Book #237

February 3, 2023 By John Fea

Rod Dreher in Hungary: “blogging and backtracking”

February 3, 2023 By John Fea

The Organization of American Historians responds to the Florida controversy over AP African American Studies

February 3, 2023 By John Fea

College in the age of A.I.

February 3, 2023 By John Fea

More from The Way of Improvement →

The Arena Blog

Equity and Justice at a Harvard Abortion Conference

February 3, 2023 By Daniel K. Williams Leave a Comment

Complicity and the Failure to Care

February 2, 2023 By Elizabeth Stice Leave a Comment

Welcome to the Arena

February 1, 2023 By Nadya Williams Leave a Comment

“The Arena” is coming to Current

January 31, 2023 By John Fea Leave a Comment

More from The Arena →

Subscribe via Email



Please wait...
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

Footer

Contact Forms

General Inquiries
Pitch Us

Search

Subscribe via Email



Please wait...
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide
Subscribe via Email


Please wait...
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide