• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Current
  • Home
  • About
    • About Current
    • Masthead
  • Podcasts
  • Blogs
    • The Way of Improvement Leads Home
    • The Arena
  • Reviews
  • 🔎
  • Way of Improvement

The “radical young intellectuals” of the American Right

John Fea   |  December 3, 2021

In a piece at The New Republic, writer and podcaster Sam Adler-Bell lists some of their names: Nate Hochman, Declan Leary, Saurabh Sharma, Jack Butler, Sohrab Ahmari, Christopher Rufo, Josh Hammer, Jack Posobiec, Curtis Yarvin, and Matthew Walther.

Here is a taste:

“Conservatism in 2021 means radicalism,” announced Nate Hochman, a 23-year-old writer at National Review. Describing the posture of his political milieu, Hochman spoke with urgency and without pretense, less eager to impress than to be understood. “We have to think of ourselves as counterrevolutionaries or restorationists who are overthrowing the regime.” He doesn’t mean by violence, necessarily. “But … there’s not a lot left to conserve in the contemporary state of things. There are things that need to be destroyed and rebuilt.”

If you’re scandalized by the language of “counterrevolution” or surprised to hear a conservative talk about “destroying” things and “overthrowing” regimes, you probably haven’t spent much time around right-wing college grads of late. Which makes sense. As a matter of demography, they’re exceedingly hard to find. “Young, highly educated people, as a group, are now overwhelmingly Democratic to an extent that’s literally never been seen before, probably ever in history,” explained David Shor, the progressive pollster and statistician. The well-known liberal biases of millennials have held for Generation Z, and education polarization continues apace. We’ve become accustomed to thinking about the distorting effect these factors have on Democratic campaigns and NGOs, which are dominated by young activists with beliefs well to the left of the median Democrat. But the same forces are shaping the right’s leading lights. Given the high statistical likelihood that a young person who went to college is a Democrat, those college grads who are not liberal—the hardheaded holdouts who buck the trend—tend to be, well, as Shor put it, “really very weird.”

Read the entire piece here.

John Fea
+ postsBio
  • John Fea
    That’s a wrap!
  • John Fea
    The Way of Improvement Leads Home blog has moved
  • John Fea
    Pamela Paul’s last New York Times column
  • John Fea
    Evangelicals and politics roundup: Wisconsin, Cory Booker, spiritual warfare, refugees, and more.
  • John Fea
    Goodbye to a Four-Year Labor of Love
  • John Fea
    Wisconsin sends Trump-Musk a message
  • John Fea
    “Would you want your doctors not to be revisionists?”
  • John Fea
    All four #1 seeds made the Final Four this year. What happened to Cinderella?
  • John Fea
    It’s the last week of CURRENT
  • John Fea
    Sunday night odds and ends
  • John Fea
    Trump’s executive order on American history has little to do with history
  • John Fea
    Should Jeffrey Goldberg have “left the room?”
  • John Fea
    What an ending!
  • John Fea
    “You can’t hold onto anything in this world. That doesn’t mean you can’t squeeze it all so tightly to your heart that it hurts.”
  • John Fea
    Is Trump capitulation “on the way out?”
  • John Fea
    Did Patrick Henry really say “Give me liberty or give me death?”
  • John Fea
    Hey Silicon Valley, “Christianity…is not a religion that can reliably deliver socially desirable outcomes, nor is it intended to be.”
  • John Fea
    The second Trump presidency is two months old. What are evangelical saying?
  • John Fea
    We need more democrats
  • John Fea
    “What if the Mets are actually good now?”

Filed Under: Way of Improvement Tagged With: Claremont Institute, conservatism, conservatives, Sam Adler-Bell