• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Current
  • Home
  • About
    • About Current
    • Masthead
  • Podcasts
  • Blogs
    • The Way of Improvement Leads Home
    • The Arena
  • Reviews
  • 🔎
  • Way of Improvement

On French secularism

John Fea   |  November 23, 2021

The French government wants a secular state. In other words, they want to keep religion out of public life. What does that mean and how is the French view of the separation of church and state different from the United States?

Here is Rachel Donadio at The Atlantic:

The histories of few countries are as deeply intertwined as those of France and the United States. Both nations are products of the Enlightenment, and each sees itself as a beacon among nations. Both embody a clear separation of Church and state. In the United States, the separation is defined by the establishment clause of the First Amendment, which prohibits the government from making any law “respecting an establishment of religion” or obstructing the free exercise of religion. The First Amendment was inspired by the earlier Virginia Statute of Religious Freedom, adopted in 1786, the work of Thomas Jefferson. Jefferson was ambassador to France when the French Revolution began, and the Marquis de Lafayette consulted him when drafting the revolutionary Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen, passed in 1789. Article 10 of that document states, “No one may be disquieted for his opinions, even religious ones, provided that their manifestation does not trouble the public order.”

Today, in France, separation of Church and state is largely defined by a 1905 law that emerged from a hard-fought battle to end the lingering temporal power of the Catholic Church. The law declares that “the republic guarantees freedom of conscience” as well as religious freedom, and stipulates that the state will not discriminate among religions. The 1905 law set the initial terms of laïcité; the word itself was introduced in France’s 1958 constitution.

The intentions in France and the United States seem similar, but they are not the same. The United States, in guaranteeing freedom of religion, sought to shield religion from state involvement. France, in guaranteeing freedom of religion, sought to shield the state from religious involvement. This distinction has consequences.

As an American who lives and works in Paris, I have become an insider-outsider in both places. Every time I return to America from France, I am startled to hear television hosts sign off with a “God bless” and to hear presidents quote the Bible or ask God to protect the United States and its troops. In the U.S., it is unusual—probably even impossible—for a candidate to run for president without invoking God. In France, bringing private beliefs into the public sphere would be seen as a violation of laïcité, and extremely gauche. In the United States, Representative Ilhan Omar can proudly wear her headscarf in the halls of Congress. In France, members of the French National Assembly or Senate are prohibited from wearing religious attire in state buildings, though not from wearing it in public spaces. Macron’s own party recently reprimanded a Muslim candidate for wearing a headscarf in campaign posters—while acknowledging that it was legal for her to do so—and withdrew its support for her candidacy in a local election. Each country is shaped by the wounds of its past. America fought a civil war over slavery. France’s civil wars were over religion.

Read the entire piece here.

John Fea
+ postsBio
  • John Fea
    That’s a wrap!
  • John Fea
    The Way of Improvement Leads Home blog has moved
  • John Fea
    Pamela Paul’s last New York Times column
  • John Fea
    Evangelicals and politics roundup: Wisconsin, Cory Booker, spiritual warfare, refugees, and more.
  • John Fea
    Goodbye to a Four-Year Labor of Love
  • John Fea
    Wisconsin sends Trump-Musk a message
  • John Fea
    “Would you want your doctors not to be revisionists?”
  • John Fea
    All four #1 seeds made the Final Four this year. What happened to Cinderella?
  • John Fea
    It’s the last week of CURRENT
  • John Fea
    Sunday night odds and ends
  • John Fea
    Trump’s executive order on American history has little to do with history
  • John Fea
    Should Jeffrey Goldberg have “left the room?”
  • John Fea
    What an ending!
  • John Fea
    “You can’t hold onto anything in this world. That doesn’t mean you can’t squeeze it all so tightly to your heart that it hurts.”
  • John Fea
    Is Trump capitulation “on the way out?”
  • John Fea
    Did Patrick Henry really say “Give me liberty or give me death?”
  • John Fea
    Hey Silicon Valley, “Christianity…is not a religion that can reliably deliver socially desirable outcomes, nor is it intended to be.”
  • John Fea
    The second Trump presidency is two months old. What are evangelical saying?
  • John Fea
    We need more democrats
  • John Fea
    “What if the Mets are actually good now?”

Filed Under: Way of Improvement Tagged With: church and state, France, secularism