
David Cutler, who teaches history at Palmer Trinity School in Palmetto Bay, Florida, wants to make history more fun by making it more relevant. He makes his case over at The Atlantic. In the process he give a nice shoutout to Bruce Lesh’s Why Don’t You Just Tell Us the Answer: Teaching Historical Thinking in Grades 7-12. I recently received a review copy of this book from the publisher but have not had a chance to crack it yet. I will now.
Here is a taste of Cutler’s post:
[Lesh] offers an array of lessons and case studies, like how to introduce historical thinking through Nat Turner’s Rebellion, chronological thinking and causality through the Railroad Strike of 1877, and historical empathy through the Truman-MacArthur Debate. Throughout, Lesh places a premium not on one’s ability to recall cold facts (which most will eventually forget, anyway), but on whether students can read critically, reference appropriate sources, and support an argument with evidence.
- Teachers are foolish to expect students to remember anything for long that has little to no direct relevance in their daily lives.
- Teachers need to do a much better job of connecting history to today, and placing a greater emphasis on how young people could learn from past mistakes.
- Teachers should assess students on what they can do with what they know, rather than how much they know at any given time.
Something interesting to me occurred last semester when I asked my students about the Vietnam War. It had no meaning to them. None of them seemed to have had a family member serve in the war (or more likely didn't know). It just illustrated how history relevance depends so much on individual perspective.