• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • Home
  • About
    • About Current
    • Masthead
  • Podcasts
  • Blogs
    • The Way of Improvement Leads Home
    • The Arena
  • Membership
  • Log In
  • Manage Your Account
  • Member Assistance Request
  • 🔎
  • Way of Improvement
  • About John
  • Vita
  • Books
  • Speaking
  • Media Requests

In Defense of Teaching to the Test

John Fea   |  January 22, 2014 Leave a Comment

“Teaching to the test” is largely frowned upon by educators.  I often tell my students about my experience teaching AP United States History.  I found myself trying to cover information so that my students would know enough material to do well on the multiple choice section of the AP exam.  As a result, there was little time for discussion and conversation.  We could not delve to deeply into issues related to historical thinking.  It always seemed like we needed to move to the next topic in order to stay on schedule.

Over at Teaching United States History, Ben Wright wants to redeem the idea of “teaching to the test,” but his understanding of this commonly used phrase looks nothing like the kind of “teaching to the test’ I found so frustrating as an AP teacher.

 Here is a taste of his methodology:

The goal of my survey courses is to get my students to think like a historian through reading primary sources, constructing arguments based on those sources and evaluating the arguments made by others.  I do not use a textbook (at least not until the American Yawp launches next fall) but instead assign about a dozen primary sources each week.  The midterm and final exam asks the students to use these primary sources to construct a historical argument that answers a broad historical question.  I the students questions, but invite them to think of their own if there is something else that occurs to them.  I will explain these questions right away on Monday and encourage students to keep them in mind throughout the course.  In a way, then, I do spend my semester teaching to the test.  But I think there’s nothing wrong with this, as long as you have a test that effectively reflects high quality learning outcomes.  A test that requires students to think critically, communicate clearly, construct arguments, an synthetically organize complex material is a test worth teaching towards. 

Thanks to Megan Piette for her help with this post.

RECOMMENDED READING

Anyone who wants to believe that Independence Day is a Christian holiday should read Frederick Douglass’s “What to a Slave is the Fourth of July?” David Barton speaks at First Baptist-Dallas. LONG FORM: Frederick Douglass and the Challenge of Seeing Clearly Josh Hawley’s “Love America Act.” Let’s break it down Department of Education proposes “priorities” for American History and Civics programs

Filed Under: Way of Improvement

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Footer

Contact Forms

General Inquiries
Pitch Us
  • Manage Your Account
  • Member Assistance Request

Search

Subscribe via Email



Please wait...
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide
Subscribe via Email


Please wait...
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide