• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • Home
  • About
    • About Current
    • Masthead
  • Podcasts
  • Blogs
    • The Way of Improvement Leads Home
    • The Arena
  • Reviews
  • Membership
  • Log In
  • Manage Your Account
  • Member Assistance Request

Hattem on the Historiography of the American Revolution

John Fea   |  September 5, 2013 Leave a Comment

New Whig

Undergraduates and graduate students in early American history take note!  Michael Hattem, a graduate student at Yale and prolific blogger at The Junto, has written a very useful overview of the way historians have understood the American Revolution from 1780 to the present.

See if you can define these different schools of interpretation:

Revolutionary (1780-1820)
Loyalist (1780-1820)
Whig (1820-1880)
Progressive (1900-1940)
Consensus (1940-1960)
New-Whig (1960-1980)
New Left (1960-1980)
Social History (1960-1980)
Neo-Progressive (1980-Present)
Founders Chic (1980-Present)

Read Hattem’s essay at the Journal of the American Revolution.

 

RECOMMENDED READING

Liberty University’s Standing for Freedom Center just released the summer issue of its journal “Reclaiming 1776.” Let’s take a look. I Think I Just Committed Treason A fuller (no pun intended) response to the David Brooks New York Times piece on evangelical dissenters The Author’s Corner with Jordan E. Taylor

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: American Revolution, historiography

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Footer

Contact Forms

General Inquiries
Pitch Us
  • Manage Your Account
  • Member Assistance Request

Search

Subscribe via Email



Please wait...
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide
Subscribe via Email


Please wait...
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide