When I teach my U.S. Survey course or my upper-division course in the American Revolution, I often used the terms “Intolerable Acts” and “Coercive Acts” interchangeably to describe the 1774 acts by Parliament that put the people of Massachusetts on the road to revolution. These acts–The Boston Port Bill, The Massachusetts Government Act, The Administration of Justice Act, The Quartering Act, and (sometimes) the Quebec Act–were passed in direct response to the Boston Tea Party of December 1773.
But when J.L. Bell of Boston 1775 fame began to look for the use of the term “Intolerable Acts” in the eighteenth century, he came up empty. In fact, the phrase “Intolerable Acts” was not used on a regular basis to describe these 1774 laws until…wait for it…1885! And it wasn’t until 1893 that the Quartering Act was included in the list of so-called “Intolerable Acts.”
I am eager to point this out to my U.S. survey students this Fall. Check out Bell’s entire article at The Journal of the American Revolution. Here is a taste:
It took another forty years before the phrase “Intolerable Acts” became a standard term for Parliament’s 1774 laws. And the impetus seems to have come from textbook writers seeking a way to organize facts for students. A History of the United States for Schools, by Alexander Johnston (1885), lists “The Four Intolerable Acts,” applying Everett’s term to the four laws that Bisset had said were most grievous. In 1893 A History of the United States, a rival school textbook by Allen C. Thomas, went further and listed “The Five Intolerable Acts.” That’s when the Quartering Act of 1774 entered the picture.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.