• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • Home
  • About
    • About Current
    • Masthead
  • Podcasts
  • Blogs
    • The Way of Improvement Leads Home
    • The Arena
  • Reviews
  • 🔎
  • Membership
  • Your Account
  • Log In
  • Member Assistance Request
  • Way of Improvement
  • About John
  • Vita
  • Books
  • Speaking
  • Media Requests

Who Fired First at Lexington?

John Fea   |  April 23, 2011 1 Comment

Up in Boston they are still living in the wake of Patriots Day.  I imagine that this time of year J.L. Bell has a significant jump in visitors to his excellent blog, Boston 1775.

Today he reflects on the first shots at the Battle of Lexington (19 April 1775).  Who actually fired the “Shot Heard Round the World,” a phrase made famous in Ralph Waldo Emerson’s Concord Hymn (1837)? 

Growing up I always thought the British fired first.  I probably learned it from this:

[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPMAf7N_pYU]

Bell notes that the debate over who fired first was contested from the very beginning.  Both sides claimed that someone from the other side pulled the trigger first.  Here is Bell’s conclusion:

Until the early twentieth century, almost all American historians echoed the provincial sources and described the British firing first. With more British sources appearing, more skepticism, and less defensiveness, more recent American authors acknowledged that the situation was probably more confused than that, and even that it was possible that the first short came from someone on the provincial side.

Read the entire post.

RECOMMENDED READING

Stanford’s Jack Rakove is the latest historian to critique the 1619 Project I Think I Just Committed Treason Asbury University revival roundup: February 14, 2023 (7:45pm) Asbury University revival roundup: February 23, 2023 (10:50PM)

Filed Under: Way of Improvement Tagged With: American Revolution, Battles of Lexington and Concord

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Jonathan says

    April 25, 2011 at 4:10 pm

    My favorite example of weighing both sides of the argument as a model for historians' use of evidence comes in David Hackett Fischer's _Paul Revere's Ride_.

    His conclusion, if I recall correctly, was that shots likely went off from both sides at about the same time. From the patriot side it was either an accidental discharge or someone not in the militia line, while the shots from the British side likely came from a pistol (an officer's weapon).

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Footer

Contact Forms

General Inquiries
Pitch Us
  • Manage Your Account
  • Member Assistance Request

Search

Subscribe via Email



Please wait...
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide
Subscribe via Email


Please wait...
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide