• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • Home
  • About
    • About Current
    • Masthead
  • Podcasts
  • Blogs
    • The Way of Improvement Leads Home
    • The Arena
  • Membership
  • Log In
  • Manage Your Account
  • Member Assistance Request
  • 🔎
  • Way of Improvement
  • About John
  • Vita
  • Books
  • Speaking
  • Media Requests

What Would Roger Williams Do?

John Fea   |  January 14, 2011 Leave a Comment

Roger Williams, the founder of the colony of Rhode Island, was one of America’s first advocates of the separation of church and state.  Williams was a devout Puritan Christian, but he also believed that religion and the government should remain separate. He thought that the “garden of the church” should not be corrupted by the “wilderness of the world.”  As a result, he called for a “wall of separation” between the two.

As Mark Silk reports, new Rhode Island governor Lincoln Chafee is taking the legacy of Williams very seriously.  In respect to the founder of his state, Chafee did not have a public prayer at his recent inaugural ceremony. 

The Catholic Church in Providence, Rhode Island is very upset with this decision and has denounced Chafee’s view of church-state separation.

Here is a taste from Silk’s blog post:

Williams was in fact a pretty truculent guy who wouldn’t join any church that would have him as a member. But he is rightly famous for his insistence on liberty of conscience–a stance that put him profoundly at odds with his Puritan neighbors in Massachusetts and Connecticut. His vision of a civil state had to do with keeping the government from pushing religion on the citizenry in any way, shape, or form. It was, he wrote, contrary to Jesus’ teaching “for the civil state to impose upon the souls of the people a religion, a worship, a ministry, oaths (in religious and civil affairs), tithes, times, days, marryings, and buryings in holy ground.”

Chafee chose to keep faith with this vision by foregoing a public prayer service on inauguration morning–out of “respect [for] the separation of church and state,” as his spokesman, Michael Trainor, put it in December. That explanation caught the attention of the Catholic bishop of Providence, Thomas J. Tobin, who took to his diocesan newspaper to denounce such church-state separationism. “By now,” he wrote, “you should be aware that the exact phrase “separation of church and state” isn’t found anywhere in our nation’s Constitution but rather was a principle that evolved later on.”

RECOMMENDED READING

Recovered from the archives: “An Open Letter to the Students of Charis Bible College” Is Separation of Church and State a Two-Way Street? Separation of Church and State, China Style REVIEW: A Winner’s History of the Catholic Church

Filed Under: Way of Improvement Tagged With: Christian America political commentary

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Footer

Contact Forms

General Inquiries
Pitch Us
  • Manage Your Account
  • Member Assistance Request

Search

Subscribe via Email



Please wait...
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide
Subscribe via Email


Please wait...
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide