• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • Home
  • About
    • About Current
    • Masthead
  • Podcasts
  • Blogs
    • The Way of Improvement Leads Home
    • The Arena
  • Reviews
  • Membership
  • Your Account
  • Log In
  • Member Assistance Request
  • Way of Improvement
  • About John
  • Vita
  • Books
  • Speaking
  • Media Requests

Historians as Public Intellectuals

John Fea   |  August 28, 2008 Leave a Comment

Last week I blogged , using Gordon Wood’s book The Purpose of the Past as my guide, about the differences between historians and public intellectuals. Now, over at the new blog The Broad Gauge Gossip, Ambrose Hofstadter Bierce III writes about several Ph.Ds in history who have left the halls of academia for work as public intellectuals.

I will raise the question here that I raised in my earlier post. At what point does a history Ph.D who speaks to public matters cease being a historian? How should historians understand their moral responsibility to the larger public? Is the past valuable only for its role in promoting a particular moral agenda in the present? Or is the very act of reconstructing past worlds and explaining these worlds to others a moral exercise in and of itself? Consider the words of Stanford education professor Sam Wineburg in his book Historical Thinking and Other Unnatural Acts:

For the narcissist sees the world–both the past and the present–in his own image. Mature historical knowing teaches us to do the opposite; to go beyond our own image, to go beyond our brief life, and to go beyond the fleeing moment in human history into which we have been born. History educates (“leads outward” in the Latin) in the deepest sense. Of the subjects in the secular curriculum, it is the best at teaching those virtues once reserved for theology–humility in the face of our limited ability to know, and awe in the face of the expanse of human history.

Again, how do we reconcile Wineburg’s thoughts about the moral role (“virtues onces reserved for theology”) of historical thinking with the somewhat presentist agenda of public intellectuals?

I start teaching my general education history survey course (US History to 1865) next week and I plan to raise this question with my students as an introductory exercise that I call “Doing History.”

I hope to hear from some of my “historian” readers.

RECOMMENDED READING

FORUM: The New Shape of Christian Public Discourse FORUM: The End of Roe, Day Four Default ThumbnailOn the slaveholder Jonathan Edwards and the Christians who read him How to Be an Activist Historian

Filed Under: Way of Improvement Tagged With: historical thinking

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Footer

Contact Forms

General Inquiries
Pitch Us
  • Manage Your Account
  • Member Assistance Request

Search

Subscribe via Email



Please wait...
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide
Subscribe via Email


Please wait...
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide